Into our 2nd year of the USSF Development Academy and the returns are positive. Sunil Gulati, John Hackworth and everyone else who has truly been behind this and helped make it work our deserving of congratulations.
But just by entering a more sophisticated player development environment you start to realize how much more there is to do. I’ve been talking with Erik Visser on Top Drawer Soccer radio and he is prescribing some very specific ideas about methods and system that bear listening to.
As financial incentive continues to be a big issue in the implementation of all of this, I’m increasingly burdened to start pushing the next big steps in the reform movement. This is a little raw, but please give it a read and respond with your thoughts. We need a little fast-forward action to further establish the concept of the youth professional in our country.
I’m told the big inhibition to MLS clubs signing their own youth programs is that the roster isn’t big enough and they don’t want to “take a chance” on the young player not being good enough to help them. So let’s do the follwoing:
Let each team expand their roster from 28 to 32 players, and make the additional 4 slots “Youth Development” slots. They key is that the players under these contracts are given guaranteed 3-year contracts that do not count against the salary cap. They don’t have to be huge contracts but make them something at least livable for a single young man, say $32K for year, plus the same college provision that the current Generation Adidas contracts have, plus something for expenses. The players have to be between 16 and 19 when they sign to be eligible, and after perhaps the first year of the program, they CAN NOT have played college soccer.
Including college and expenses this should add up to $250K per team, per year. If the league is going to 20 teams pretty soon that is about $5 million per year to give up to 80 young players the chance to train and play as professionals for 3 years.
As with other pro leagues around the world, some of those players will fail to make it - they end up with a college education opportunity just like someone who has been given a scholarship. They just won’t end up playing college soccer.
Some of the players will advance to the first team of an MLS franchise, helping more American players become professionals.
SOME of the players will attract attention from overseas, much more likely for them as they are in a professional environment rather than a club or a college. This will give them a better financial opportunity AND bring some money back to MLS clubs in transfer fees.
A few of these players will really strike it big, having been helped by the chance to live and play as a pro from a younger age. These are the guys who will collect the bigger paychecks and ultimately draw more money in the transfer market, a few of which will easily fund this program.
The money for this at the beginning can come from a sponsor. In fact I would argue that this is a better use of the Generation adidas money.
Now along with this, our Development Academy should be set up in tiers, where the non -pro clubs will be aligned with the MLS teams - and they will feed into each of those clubs as part of a territory. The MLS teams will pay something to each of these clubs up front so they can make the academy programs free for their older players. Something like $50K per year to participating club, which comes out to maybe $5 million
Additionally, any money coming in for these young pros will filter back through the MLS club to the youth clubs. A 5 percent fee of a $5million transfer fee would pretty much make a youth club’s year, or more. You have to do this so it’s not just a payout. It helps give incentive for the clubs to be doing things the right way, to increase their chances of producing a marketable player.
By the way none of this prevents a player from going to Europe if that’s what he wants, nor should it stop a club from working out an arrangement with Euro clubs, but it gives a much more imminent option for players with their domestic league.
The benefit for college soccer is that fewer players, way fewer I’m guessing, would leave school early as the professional opportunity is there for them much earlier. Going to school for 3 years and then going pro before the last isn’t really helping that player’s development so much, it’s just throwing a crimp into the college program. We’ll still be getting players from college soccer through the draft, and college soccer is still a great opportunity for thousands of players every year so this is important too. MLS can agree to take players before or after a 4-year college soccer program, not during (the league rules already allow clubs who had players in their youth system to retain rights to them when they go to play college soccer).
If we can get a sponsor to fund it at the beginning, some leadership from the Federation to get the youth clubs in line, and cooperation and vision from the MLS clubs to recognize that for us to become great as a league and a nation, we have to start developing our own players and giving them a REAL chance to make it as pros, this could come together as a very significant step forward.
People can say it’s far-fetched to think the clubs or MLS or college programs will agree to this, but when I started writing about the Academy 5 or 6 years ago, that’s what they said then. With some vision and an understanding that it is the best long-term financial setup for everyone, it can happen.