Updated: February 18, 2010
Comments (8) E-mail this to a friend

Year-round training has its drawbacks

Article Written By Robert Ziegler, ESNN
Here in the Midwest, there's snow on the ground. Temperatures are below freezing and it's just downright unpleasant.

We're used to it mind you. No reason for those of you dwelling in California or Florida or even Hawaii to feel sorry. We can handle it.

Now, that doesn't mean there's any soccer being played outside. It's definitely not suitable for that, and don't tell me about how they play through the winter in England and Scotland. I've seen some of those games both in person and on TV and when the conditions are like they are here now, the soccer tends to be pretty poor.

elite boys club soccer players
Are our youth players training too much?
Of course a suitable indoor training facility is like gold for a youth club. There's no weather situation that four walls, a roof and field turf can't overcome. Certainly the convenience of an indoor field is considerable.

Nothing wrong with that either, it's a good use of architecture and technology to help maintain a consistent training schedule.

What it does begin to touch on however, is the issue of overtraining.

When I first started following and thinking about elite youth soccer and player development, I kind of automatically adopted the more is better approach. "Since major soccer nations around the world are training more, we should do it too. If we want to win a World Cup, we have to get serious and starting training more often and all the time."

I might have written those very words, but now I'm not so sure.

Understand, I do think more FREQUENT training is the right idea. Four or five training sessions a week along with a weekly match is a good setup during the season. The rules for USSF Development Academy are thinking along the correct lines. Some top girls clubs are doing this sort of thing on their own and I applaud that.

However, the concept of year-round training the way it is practiced by many clubs and teams here may be misguided. First of all, you might be surprised, as I was, to learn that the professional clubs who train the best players overseas don't compete year-round. Every country is unique, but typically the approach is to have a pair of six-week breaks, one in summer and one in winter, for young players. Along with that combined 3 months off, some shorter breaks are built into the seasons. Even in England and Scotland, home of the aforementioned winter play, the youngsters get a good month off around the holidays.

The main reason for this is just a basic acknowledgment that you need to let players regenerate physically, mentally and emotionally. Coaches can stand the break from training as well.

It may be that the argument for doing it our way is more financially-driven, since these top teams in our country are all paying to play. This is not the only drawback of our business-first approach to youth development, but it's a big one. My position on this continues to be that we need to properly take care of those who are teaching players how to play, without requiring them to push participants to unnatural levels of participation for financial reasons.

The other side of this is the whole specialization issue. People my age will remember star athletes in high school playing two or even three sports. The idea that our children today cannot do that seems unfair somehow. But that issue is much bigger than club soccer. It has more to do with our society and the way we approach sports now, with casual or recreational involvement being almost a thing of the past. Everything, even at the youngest ages, is hyper-organized by adults, and if you miss a season well, look out, because your child may have really fallen behind on the road to stardom and the scholarship.

To that I say, relax everybody. All of this pushing is mainly leading us to burnout, injuries and a complete loss of the joy that any athlete should get from participating in his or her sport. You can still pursue excellence and have quality training and player development, but let's remember the whole and the big pictures, so that our players can excel at the game in the short AND long terms.

Let's not overdo it.

The line between dedication and overdoing it can sometimes be remarkably thin. In our elite soccer circles there's an undercurrent of thinking that more is better and the facts tell us this is not always true.

Add New Comment

You have to be authenticated in order to post a comment. You can use the "Sign in" button or connect with your facebook account.

Connect with Facebook

Showing 8 of 8 comments


  • By #1Bruno on Tuesday, February 23, 2010
    a chicago area dap club is training kids 6 days a week!!! dudes are gonna get burned out and quit it is good to practice and and get better but makin kids drive 6 days a week is stoopid.
  • By dkcxn64 on Tuesday, February 23, 2010
    After following the discussion, how long would a recommended pause be ? 6 weeks with no soccer at all perhaps alittle jogging to keep fit ? or ?
  • By MC on Thursday, February 18, 2010
    Well written. I wish the coaches would head the advice.
  • By Troy75 on Thursday, February 18, 2010
    I have a Ph.D. in Physical Education - and only mention that because I think I may be somewhat more aware of the negative effects of overtraining.

    Frankly, I see few coaches who take into account the physiological development of their players. Growth during the formative years is prompted by periods of rest. Most importantly, younger athletes simply cannot hold up to the rigors of hard daily activity, much less constant stress over weeks and months. There is a vast difference between athletes who are 14 and those who are 18. This is a pet peeve of mine and I appreciate the content of your article.
  • By Georges on Thursday, February 18, 2010
    What about kids playing soccer for fun in the snow, mudd, recess in school etcc...? If kids can do that along with the trainnings that they get, that's when we will also be a football nation. Bottom line is if kids are not playing pickup or for fun also, we are making a lot of robots playing the sport. The alternative is, the clubs should also encourage their members to also use their facility to play street or frestyle soccer on some of the days or at least one day a week, so they can learn to think for themselves and develop their own soccer attitude. Kids that are also playing for fun in any settings or environment will most likely develop to become the the next american Pele, Maradona, Best, Zico, Ronaldo (both), Ronaldinho, Kryuff, Platini and others.
  • By obvious on Thursday, February 18, 2010
    Yes, Beethoven had no business playing the piano so much.
  • By whitehart on Thursday, February 18, 2010
    For those interested in contemplating the development of expertise/skilled behavior (many sports including soccer fit here) I would recommend looking at some of the work by Dr. K. Anders Ericsson. While his major premise examines the concept of talent vs. practice (the nature-nurture question for sport) he does provide some convincing evidence for the more is better position. It also speaks directly to reasons why focusing early and on one activity is important (to accumulate sufficient deliberate practice).
  • By Bill Archer on Thursday, February 18, 2010
    Robert

    As always, excellent piece.

    A couple of comments:

    Most players revert back to their high school teams for three months a year. Both the Academy and Super Y have tried to get them to opt out but neither had much success. The lure of playing in front of your friends, etc., is simply too strong to fight; all you end up doing is losing players, since in the end if you demand they make a choice most of them will choose HS.

    One gets heartily tired of hearing elite level youth coaches complaining about the time being "wasted", playing under a less qualified coach and with and against weaker players, a lot of kids revert to bad habits the youth coach thought he'd beaten out of them years before. I'm certain you know whereof I speak.

    Nevertheless, it's an admission that the coach, by necessity as well as by HS rules, has not been a part of that players' life for 1/4 of the year.

    To me, that break from the coach and team - even if it's not a complete break from soccer - serves a valuable mental purpose.

    Couple that with the fact that in much of the country youth clubs run an indoor session and while we're not talking "vacations" from soccer (although a lot of people would tell you that Wallball is just that) they still amount to substantial "mental shifts" if you will. A change of scenery, a change of perspective, a change of venue.

    "More" is not always better, but neither is "less". I've learned to appreciate the value of "different".

    Bill Archer