TopDrawerSoccer concludes March updates to the TeamRank Top 25 with the Girls U15, U14, and U13 age groups. These are the fourth and final age groups updated for the month of March. Check back in April for a new look at all of the age groups from the TopDrawerSoccer Club Soccer TeamRank Top 25. 

If you have any questions about the TeamRank process, please email rankings@topdrawersoccer.com. 

 

Girls U15

LA Galaxy San Diego and IMG Academy make the big moves in the Girls TeamRank Top 25 for the month of March. Both Development Academy squads jumped into the top 10 after rattling off some impressive results recently.  

Check out the rest of the Top 25 for the Girls U15 club soccer team ranking for the March update.  

 

Girls U14

California Thorns FC - DA and D’Feeters SC - ECNL are the two teams on the move in the U14 age group for the Girls TeamRank Top 25. Thorns continues to put together an impressive season in the Girls Development Academy and D’Feeters are climbing the standings in the ECNL. 

Check out the rest of the Top 25 for the Girls U14 club soccer team ranking for the March update.  

 

Girls U13

Following a successful spell in the National Cup competition, Legends FC jumps into the top three in this month’s update to the Girls TeamRank Top 25 for the U13 age group. Ohio Premier also moved up in the rankings this month. 

Check out the rest of the Top 25 for the Girls U13 club soccer team ranking for the March update. 

 

TeamRank is the comprehensive team-ranking system devised by TopDrawerSoccer.com to provide an objective and common-sense approach to determining which elite youth soccer teams are the best in the nation.

The rankings, updated monthly, are primarily results-based, with a nod toward the league and championship competitions that emulate how excellence is determined in leading soccer nations around the world.

Tournaments are also included but at a reduced value due to the many mitigating factors involving such events, including attrition and guest players.

A final layer of executive evaluation is provided to account for variables that often impact results, thus ensuring that the monthly lists are not subjective, but are not purely mechanical.